March v. West Mall Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant James Crockarell appeals the trial court’s granting of respondent Laurel March’s motion to clarify an earlier judgment. Appellant claims (1) he was entitled to a jury trial, (2) the issue addressed by the trial court was res judicata, (3) the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the matter, and (4) the motion was barred by Minn.R. Civ.P. 13.01. We affirm.
FACTS
Crockarell and March were formerly married. During the marriage, they formed a partnership with Dr. James Dunn. The partnership was called West Mall Partnership and was formed to own and manage a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stieler v. OstranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Parsons Electric Co. v. Village of WatertownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Cummins v. RedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Pawelk v. Camden TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990