Legal Opinion

Mank v. Green

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 6, 2004No. CIV.03-42-P-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge.

This case arises out of the contention made by Plaintiff Karen L. Mank, Administrator of the Hannaford Health Plan, that Defendants Ellen Green and her lawyers, Jack H. Simmons and the firm of Berman & Simmons, P.A. (“the firm”), have failed to comply with a provision in an ERISA-governed employee health benefits plan dealing with the obligations of plan participants to reimburse the Plan for medical payments it makes on their behalf. The Administrator, however, in addition to filing claims…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spellman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2008
  2. EWALD v. PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CORPORATE OFFICE HEADQUARTERSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API