Legal Opinion · Dissent

Atkinson v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1935No. 23995Published

1Dissent

Guerra, J.,

dissenting. ■ The controlling question in this case, as agreed upon by counsel, is whether or not a plaintiff may recover for wounded feelings, unaccompanied by physical injury, where the wounded feelings and mental pain and anguish are caused by a wilful and intentional act as distinguished from a negligent act. As a general rule, most cases involving mental pain and anguish as an item of damage arise where there is an accompanying damage to person, reputation, or property, or breach of contract. Our courts are committed to the principle that there can be no recovery for mental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Bazemore v. Savannah HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Dunn v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API