Legal Opinion

Considine v. Cinganelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated March 15, 2000, as granted the motion of the defendant United Steel Products, Inc., and the separate motion of the defendants Carlo Cinganelli, Antoinette Cinganelli, and 118-17 Liberty Avenue Management Corp., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schneider v. Kings Highway Hospital Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Dunleavy v. TuttleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Green v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Smith v. J.B.H., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API