Legal Opinion

Quanimptewa v. Hopi Tribe

Hopi Appellate Court

Decided November 21, 1997No. Nos. 1999/92, AP-000-00PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*291 OPINION AND ORDER

Glorianna Quanimptewa asks this court to overturn her conviction for aiding and abetting an assault and battery, based upon 1) being found guilty as a “principal” without being found guilty of the underlying offense; 2) the vagueness of the term “the Tribe” in the statutory definition of principal; and 3) insufficiency of evidence, Appellant filed her Appeal and Brief more than two months past the statutory filing deadline.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Appellant was charged with “Assault and Battery—aiding and abetting another to commit, in violation of Hopi Ordinance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Davis v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Kiefer v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Poleahla v. Hopi TribeHopi Appellate Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lomayestewa v. Hopi TribeHopi Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API