Northampton Media Associates v. Federal Communications Commission, Cutter Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.
BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge:
Northampton Media Associates (“NMA”) asserts that the Federal Communications Commission should have rejected Cutter Broadcasting, Inc.’s application for a broadcast station construction permit because Cutter did not have documentation on hand to support its certification that it was financially qualified. The FCC replies that under the procedures then in effect, prior documentation was not required. Although the Commission failed to explain its departure from FCC precedents that support NMA’s position, we affirm…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amor Family Broadcasting Group v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Estereotempo, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Alegria I, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Heritage Communications, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Damsky v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Weyburn Broadcasting Limited Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission, James River Communications Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Mission Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Coast Tv, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.