Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Brown v. City of Canton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 80-1159Published

1DissentCelebrezze, C. J.

The writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy which is customarily granted with caution. The conditions which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of mandamus are, as recently stated in State, *186ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6, paragraph one of the syllabus, as follows:

“In order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. (State, ex rel. Harris, v. Rhodes, 54 Ohio St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Williams v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API