Andrus v. Utah
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Me. Justice Powell, with whom The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist join,
dissenting.
Since the early days of the Republic, the Federal Government’s compact with each new State has granted the State land for the support of education and allowed the State to *521select land of equal acreage as indemnity for deficiencies in the original grant. Today, the Court holds that the Taylor Grazing Act abrogated those compacts by approving selection requirements completely at odds with the equal acreage principle. Nothing in the Court’s opinion persuades me that Congress meant so…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Beecher v. WetherbySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cooper v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.