Legal Opinion

People v. Fraize

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1995No. B087051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

Introduction

Following a court trial, defendant Larry W. Fraize was convicted of two counts of violating Penal Code section 288a, subdivision (e) which prohibits a jail inmate from engaging in oral copulation, even if consensual. On this appeal, defendant contends the statute does not apply to his actions because the statute only criminalizes oral copulation by a jail inmate and at the time of the events it is undisputed he was a deputy sheriff. We reject this contention, finding defendant’s convictions are proper based upon an aiding and abetting analysis.

Factual and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Hutchins v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. SantibanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Sabri YakouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. KeovilayphoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. United States v. Yakou, SabriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Sabri YakouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API