Legal Opinion

People v. Romeo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury had been informed, during the course of the trial, that Gramando had requested the District Attorney’s office to dismiss the gun charge against his wife and that such *753charge had actually been dismissed before he testified against the appellant. The jurors had not, however, been told that Gramando had offered to explain an unsolved murder case if he were assured that his wife would not be prosecuted on the gun charge. We find in that circumstance no basis or warrant for concluding that there was either falsification of testimony by the witness or suppression of fact by the prosecutor.

W…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Benedetto Romeo v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. People v. RomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Benedetto Romeo v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Benedetto Romeo v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API