Legal Opinion
Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 19, 1995No. 78284PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Section 213.070(2), RSMo 1994, defines “an unlawful discriminatory practice” to include retaliation against “any other person ... because such person” has filed a complaint under the Missouri Human Rights Act. The issue in this case is whether a former employee is a “person” under section 213.070(2).
The trial court found that a former employee is not a person within the meaning of the statute. The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirmed. We have jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 10. We reverse.
*623I.
Hereford Concrete Products, Inc. (“Hereford”) employed John Keeney from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Irene PANTCHENKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. B. DOLGE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Keith D. Bailey v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Kearney Special Road District v. County of ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Lane v. Ground Round, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
- Sweeney v. City of LadueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Mary Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co., Inc. And Arch Coal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Vicki CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emanuel CLEAVER II, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- William E. Gagnon, Jr. v. Sprint Corporation, Doing Business as Sprint Spectrum Finance Corporation, Doing Business as Sprint PcsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- American Standard Insurance Co. v. HargraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Barekman v. City of RepublicMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.