United States v. Quintanilla
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRitter, Senior Judge
I concur with the majority opinion, except as to the appropriate remedy for the military judge’s erroneous grant of the Government’s challenge for cause against Master Sergeant (MSgt) Buckham. I am not persuaded that the findings must be set aside. I would vote to set aside the sentence only, and order a rehearing on sentence.
The majority properly cites two United States Supreme Court decisions that found only the sentence is affected when a juror is improperly dismissed because of his or her views on capital punishment that do not rise to the level of “preventing or substantially impairing”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. GilesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. PritchettNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998