Legal Opinion

Buker, Et Ux. v. Webster

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bufokd, J. —

The appeal brings for review order overruling motion to dismiss bill of complaint by which it was sought to foreclose a lien for labor and material.

It is impossible to determine from the bill of complaint whether the complainant performed the labor and furnished the materials in the capacity of a contractor, under the provisions of Chapter 17097, Acts of 1935, or as a laborer and materialman.

Section 1 of Chapter 17097, supra, defines “contractor,” “laborer” and “materialman,” as follows:

“Contractor” means a person other than a materialman or laborer who enters into a contract with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cary Co. v. Whiting HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Southern Paint Mfg. Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hardee v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Grant v. WesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. The Masterbilt Corporation v. S. A. Ryan Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph LangnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Miracle Center Dev. v. Mad Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API