Buker, Et Ux. v. Webster
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Bufokd, J. —
The appeal brings for review order overruling motion to dismiss bill of complaint by which it was sought to foreclose a lien for labor and material.
It is impossible to determine from the bill of complaint whether the complainant performed the labor and furnished the materials in the capacity of a contractor, under the provisions of Chapter 17097, Acts of 1935, or as a laborer and materialman.
Section 1 of Chapter 17097, supra, defines “contractor,” “laborer” and “materialman,” as follows:
“Contractor” means a person other than a materialman or laborer who enters into a contract with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cary Co. v. Whiting HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Southern Paint Mfg. Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardee v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Grant v. WesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- The Masterbilt Corporation v. S. A. Ryan Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Joseph LangnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Miracle Center Dev. v. Mad Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.