Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ivie Bowen v. Dale Foltz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1985No. 83-1558Published

1DissentContie, Circuit Judge

Since the record in this case plainly discloses that petitioner’s conviction was obtained through the efforts of appellate counsel which were both unreasonable and prejudicial, our Constitution and the expressed intention of our legislators, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, requires that the writ of habeas corpus be granted.

The Supreme Court has recently affirmed our conclusion that “[a] first appeal as of right ... is not adjudicated in accord with due process of law if the appellant does not have the effective assistance of an attorney.” Evitts v. Lucey, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 830, 836, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. People v. LiggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API