Ivie Bowen v. Dale Foltz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentContie, Circuit Judge
Since the record in this case plainly discloses that petitioner’s conviction was obtained through the efforts of appellate counsel which were both unreasonable and prejudicial, our Constitution and the expressed intention of our legislators, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, requires that the writ of habeas corpus be granted.
The Supreme Court has recently affirmed our conclusion that “[a] first appeal as of right ... is not adjudicated in accord with due process of law if the appellant does not have the effective assistance of an attorney.” Evitts v. Lucey, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 830, 836, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. LiggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.