Legal Opinion
Claim of Haibel v. C. G. Haibel, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 8, 1983, which found that claimant was entitled to reduced earning benefits. U On January 7, 1980, claimant, president of his own home contracting firm, *679sustained an intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke) as a result of an automobile accident. The employer’s insurance carrier paid workers’ compensation benefits until November 11,1980, at which time it was asserted that claimant had fully recovered and that any reduction in earnings was based solely on economic conditions. Following a hearing, the Board concluded that claimant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Currie v. Town of DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Fabrizio v. J. R. J. Concrete Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Yankoski v. Carborundum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Claim of Yerry v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Gugino v. New York State Workmen's Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Johnson v. Onondaga Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Coyle v. Intermagnetics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Matter of Rosales v. Eugene J. Felice LandscapingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Pulcastro v. N & S Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Mancini v. Scotia Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.