Legal Opinion

Magnetite Mining Co. v. Wilmore Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by the Magnetite Mining Company against the Wilmore Realty Company and another. Judgment rendered for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJaycox, J.

The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner in fee and in possession of the premises in suit, brings this action under section 1638 et seq. of the Code of Civil' Procedure to remove a cloud from his title, consisting of the defendant’s claim of title under a tax deed.

[1] The first question raised is as to .the sufficiency of plaintiff’s possession. Prior to the amendment of 1891, actual possession was required under this section (1638) of the Code; but since that amendment constructive possession is sufficient. Vanderveer Crossings v. Rapalje, 133 App. Div. 203-206, 117 N. Y. Supp. 485. As the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Churchill v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Vanderveer Crossings v. RapaljeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Merritt v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Surety Co. v. BrinkNew York Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API