Legal Opinion

Prewitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1942No. 22286Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The State has filed an able and exhaustive motion for a rehearing in which it seriously contends that we erred in the original disposition of this case by holding that the trial court committed error in declining to sustain appellant’s challenge for cause of the juror J. T. Conn and that as a result appellant •was forced to exercise a peremptory challenge; and after having exhausted his fifteen peremptory challenges he was forced to accept A. D. Chapman, who was objectionable to him. The State contends, and we think properly so, that the bills…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  2. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Rippey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  4. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API