Prewitt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
The State has filed an able and exhaustive motion for a rehearing in which it seriously contends that we erred in the original disposition of this case by holding that the trial court committed error in declining to sustain appellant’s challenge for cause of the juror J. T. Conn and that as a result appellant •was forced to exercise a peremptory challenge; and after having exhausted his fifteen peremptory challenges he was forced to accept A. D. Chapman, who was objectionable to him. The State contends, and we think properly so, that the bills…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Rippey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926