Legal Opinion

People v. Lloyd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that an erroneous denial of suppression of a confession and showup entitles him to the return of his guilty pleas, upon which he was convicted of first degree robbery and third degree burglary. Even if we were to agree that suppression was improperly denied — a question we do not reach — still any such error would on the facts presented not entitle defendant to the relief he requests. Here, unlike People v Coles (62 NY2d 908), People v Rolston (50 NY2d 1048), People v Burrows (46 NY2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. ColesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. RolstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API