Legal Opinion

Ronne v. Hirsh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1919No. 8087PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County: 'Conn Linn, Judge. Action by J. K. Ronne against Manuel Hirsh. Judgment for plaintiff, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.

This action was commenced by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, to recover of defendant in error, as defendant below, damages for breach of contract. Pursuant to instruction to return a verdict in favor of plaintiff for a nominal sum, the jury fixed the amount of plaintiff’s recovery at $1, for which judgment was rendered, to reverse which this proceeding is prosecuted. The only errors urged for reversal are those of law occurring at the trial. The defendant in error objects to the consideration thereof upon the ground that no motion in writing for a new trial was filed in the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ewert v. WillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Philbrock v. Home Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Testerman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Clark v. CawdellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Cornish v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Bowers v. CheeverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API