Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Neal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Probate of will. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. August 14, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. If a married woman executed a will by which she devised certain land and personalty to her husband and other lands to relatives of hers, and if subsequently her husband, by fraudulent representations as to the conduct of her relatives, procured her to make another will in which no legacies at all were left to some of such relatives, and the bulk of the estate was devised to the husband, one of the legatees in the original will, who contended that it had never been lawfully revoked, and who was omitted from the second will as a legatee, could interpose a caveat to the probate in solemn form…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hooks v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ezell v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Stephens v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. In Re Carlson's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Deering v. KeeverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API