Legal Opinion

Loranger v. Jardine

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This suit was an action of assumpsit, brought in justice’s court for a balance due on account. The plaintiff filed a bill of items containing the account on both sides, and claimed a balance due him from the defendant of $42.80. Upon the trial the defendant did not appear or plead before the justice, and plaintiff obtained judgment for the amount of his claim. Defendant appealed to the circuit court for the county of Wayne, when the cause was again tried by the circuit judge, and judgment again rendered for the plaintiff.-' Defendant, on the trial at the circuit, contested the-vplaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Deering v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1843

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Niagara Falls Brewing Co. v. WallMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API