Legal Opinion

Chesley v. De Graff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Inoka county, where the action was tried by Young, J., without a |ury.

1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.

During the months of April and May, 1884, the plaintiffs caused to be driven out of a tributary of Crow Wing river, in this state, a large quantity of pine logs, amounting to about 2,000,-000 feet. At the same time, and higher up the stream, the defendants had a drive of about 4,000,000 feet of logs, which they intended to have boomed at Motley, about 50 miles below, on the same river, to be there manufactured. These logs were floated down, and became intermingled with the plaintiffs’ logs, and were jointly driven by the employes of both parties for about four days, when defendants’ men were…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Dalles Improvement Co. v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. O'Brien v. GlasowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API