LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. ITP Service
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 19-CV-01538-LHK P.C., 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL 14 v. JURISDICTION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 15 GLOTRADE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 16 Defendants. 17 18 LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. (“Plaintiff”) sued eighteen defendants, including 19 WTMR, LLC (“Defendant”), for alleged violations of the Lanham Act, California’s False 20 Advertising Law, and California’s Unfair Competition Law, as well as a claim for intentional 21…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.