Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Grantham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1995No. AV93000738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

This is the second time this case has been before us. The trial court divorced the parties on September 24, 1992, incorporating into the divorce judgment an agreement between the parties; that agreement provided for the father to have custody of the minor child, with specific visitation rights to the mother. In October 1992, the mother filed a post-trial motion, pursuant to Rule 59(b), Ala. R.Civ.P., alleging that the agreement had been obtained by “fraud, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence and deceit.” After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion. The mother…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purcell Co., Inc. v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ramsay Health Care, Inc. v. FollmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Brocato v. BrocatoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Porter v. PorterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Grantham v. GranthamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Claybrook v. ClaybrookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Belcourt v. BelcourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Mealing v. MealingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  4. Holder v. HolderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Shinnick v. ShinnickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API