Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Abernathy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1969No. 44592PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. Cofield v. Johnson, 118 Ga. App. 689 (165 SE2d 472).

2. The appellants contend that they were deprived of their constitutional right to due process because they were not properly notified of the proceeding and were not given a right to obtain an attorney. There is nothing to show these issues were raised in the lower court.

Constitutional questions cannot be considered by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court where it does not appear from the record that they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Dallas Utility Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Herrington v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Cofield v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Southerland v. Oxford GroupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Wright v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API