Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1973No. 7326SC129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the conclusion of the trial court that the in-court identifications of defendant by State’s witnesses Carrie Lynn Schrecengost and Tony Prince were “of independent origin and not tainted by pre-trial identification procedures.”

The record fails to disclose an objection by defendant to testimony of Mrs. Schrecengost that “this man (indicating Brown) to whom I am now taking a look ... is the man that was standing in front of me in Horne’s Motor Lodge on the night of December 25th when I was shot and robbed,” or that defendant objected to testimony…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CauthenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. DellingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API