State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error the conclusion of the trial court that the in-court identifications of defendant by State’s witnesses Carrie Lynn Schrecengost and Tony Prince were “of independent origin and not tainted by pre-trial identification procedures.”
The record fails to disclose an objection by defendant to testimony of Mrs. Schrecengost that “this man (indicating Brown) to whom I am now taking a look ... is the man that was standing in front of me in Horne’s Motor Lodge on the night of December 25th when I was shot and robbed,” or that defendant objected to testimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CauthenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. DellingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975