Legal Opinion

State v. Crook

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1977No. 12180PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

The central issue presented by this appeal from a conviction of first degree burglary is whether certain exhibits should have been excluded from evidence because of a gap in their chain of custody. Defendant-appellant Bruce Crook was convicted of the first degree burglary of the Salmon River Coffee Shop in Salmon, Idaho. At trial, the primary evidence against him was the testimony of Roger Hartley, who pleaded guilty to receiving the proceeds from the burglary, and the testimony of William Marshall, a criminologist at the State Forensic Laboratory. Marshall testified that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guidi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. PontierIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. CutlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SmootIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. LaMereIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API