Legal Opinion

La Bourgogne

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 23, 1905No. 174PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the District Court, Southern District of New York, granting petition for limitation of liability for damages and loss occasioned by a collision between the steamship La Bourgogne and the ship Cromartyshire off Sable Island, in a dense fog, at 5 a. m., July 4, 1898. The opinion of Judge Townsend, sitting in the District Court, dealing…

Read the full summary

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the District Court, Southern District of New York, granting petition for limitation of liability for damages and loss occasioned by a collision between the steamship La Bourgogne and the ship Cromartyshire off Sable Island, in a dense fog, at 5 a. m., July 4, 1898. The opinion of Judge Townsend, sitting in the District Court, dealing with the questions here presented, is reported in 117 Fed. 261. Upon this opinion a decree was entered granting the…

1Opinion of the Court

EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The record is very voluminous. An examination of the briefs of the various appellants indicates that the important questions presented upon the appeals are as follows: First. Should not the petitioner be compelled to pay to the trustee the following sums: (a) The freight and passage money received by the petitioner for the passage from New York to Havre, (b) The freight and passage money received for-the preceding passage from Havre to New York, (c) The amount of money received from the French government as compensation for carrying the mails on the two passages.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. The Main v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. International Nav. Co. v. LindstromCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. Atlas S. S. Co. v. La Campagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. The HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  3. Hamilton v. North Pac. S. S. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ralli v. New York & T. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Marshall v. Westfal, Larsen & Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API