Legal Opinion

Prestenbach v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided December 3, 2013No. 2012-CA-01441-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Garrett Prestenbach Jr. seeks specific performance of an option contract to purchase Gerald Collins’s property. The problem is, at the time Prestenbach claims he validly exercised his option, he indisputably lacked the financing to purchase the property. So even if Prestenbach’s option-to-purchase contract had become a contract to sell, Prestenbach is not entitled to the remedy of specific performance because he cannot show he was “ready, willing, and able” to purchase the property *556within a reasonable time following the option period. We thus affirm the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Busching v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bradley v. Kelley Bros. Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  4. Duke v. WhatleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Creely v. HosemannMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrett J. Prestenbach, Jr. v. J. Gerald CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API