Legal Opinion

People v. Perkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1986No. F005550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

Defendant Donald Gene Perkins and Donald Carroll Pollard were convicted by jury of robbery in violation of Penal Code 1 section 211. The jury also found that Perkins was armed with a firearm within the meaning of section 12022, subdivision (a).

Perkins was sentenced to the upper term of five years on the robbery conviction, plus a one-year enhancement pursuant to section 12022, subdivision (a).

For reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment.

Statement of Facts

A. Motion to Suppress Identification

On August 17, 1984, at approximately 5:30 p.m., two men robbed the Nunez Liquor store…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. People v. BustamanteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. United States v. Charles Layton CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MitchamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. DeSantisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. Carlos M.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. WimberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API