Legal Opinion
Brinson v. Brinson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 9, 1907No. 673Published
Complaint, from city court of Waynesboro — Judge Johnston. June 6, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtRowell, J.
1. The evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict.
2. The assignments of error as to the admission of testimony are fatally defective, in that they do not state what objection was made thereto when it was offered. Blackburn v. Woodward, 128 Ga. 226 (57 S. E. 318); McFarland v. Darien R. Co., 127 Ga. 97 (2), (56 S. E. 74); Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn, 127 Ga. 664 (5), (56 S. E. 757). See also Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), (56 S. E. 998).
3. None of the other exceptions are meritorious. Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howard Supply Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- McFarland v. Darien & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Lewis, Robinson & Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Blackburn v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907