Ashuelot Boot & Shoe Co. v. Hoit
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
From Cheshire Circuit Court. Assumpsit. Tried before Ladd, J., and a jury. Plea, the general issue. The declaration is as follows: “For that the said defendants, at said Keene, heretofore, to wit, on the twentieth day of April, A. D. 1871, in consideration that the said plaintiffs would organize and form under the General Statutes of New Hampshire a corporation for the purpose of manufacturing boots and shoes in the town of Keene aforesaid, with a paid up capital of not less…
Read the full summary
From Cheshire Circuit Court. Assumpsit. Tried before Ladd, J., and a jury. Plea, the general issue. The declaration is as follows: “For that the said defendants, at said Keene, heretofore, to wit, on the twentieth day of April, A. D. 1871, in consideration that the said plaintiffs would organize and form under the General Statutes of New Hampshire a corporation for the purpose of manufacturing boots and shoes in the town of Keene aforesaid, with a paid up capital of not less than fifty thousand dollars divided into shares of one hundred dollars each, and that one T. H. Leverett would, in…
1Concurrence
In Low v. Railroad, 45 N.H. 376 et seq., are numerous authorities cited by BELLOWS, J., which fully support the claim that this suit may be maintained. Exceptions overruled, and
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Low v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1864