United States v. Mark Claude McKinley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant McKinley was convicted of refusing to submit for induction into the armed services in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. Appellant appeals in forma pauperis, and we affirm.
The facts surrounding appellant’s refusal are uncontroverted: On December 16, 1968, appellant was classifed 1-A by his local board. At a subsequent pre-in-duction physical, he was found acceptable. On November 7, 1969, appellant’s local board mailed him a Current Information Questionnaire (SSS Form 127), and he was instructed to fill it out and return it to the board. In the part of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Gerald Alan BorkenhagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. George Llewellyn Jones, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Michael Francis HodginsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Douglas Francis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. James Robert ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.