Legal Opinion

Pearman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1986No. 83A01-8605-CR-122Published

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFE, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Paul Pearman appeals his conviction by jury trial of two counts of incest involving acts of sexual intercourse with his stepdaughter, G.C. We affirm.

FACTS

Pearman was charged with two separate acts of sexual intercourse with G.C., on July 5, 1983, and January 11, 1984. G.C. testified as to these acts of intercourse and that Pearman was married to her mother. In addition, a deed wherein Pearman and G.C.'s mother, Barbara Pearman, were grantors which recited they were husband and wife, and a mortgage wherein Pear-man and Barbara were mortgagors which contained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hansford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Squire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bishop v. Brittain Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Graham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API