Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shearer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 1682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Because we believe that the lower court erred in denying appellant’s Rule 1100(f)1 application, we vacate the judgment of sentence and order appellant discharged.

*572In Commonwealth v. Shelton, 469 Pa. 8, 364 A.2d 694, 696 (1976), our Supreme Court stated: “Rule 1100 mandates the commencement of trial within a specifically defined period of time. It provides for two exclusions from the computation of the mandatory period. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(d).[2] Whether or not circumstances exist in any given case which warrant excluding certain periods of time pursuant to section (d) is to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API