Commonwealth v. Shearer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Because we believe that the lower court erred in denying appellant’s Rule 1100(f)1 application, we vacate the judgment of sentence and order appellant discharged.
*572In Commonwealth v. Shelton, 469 Pa. 8, 364 A.2d 694, 696 (1976), our Supreme Court stated: “Rule 1100 mandates the commencement of trial within a specifically defined period of time. It provides for two exclusions from the computation of the mandatory period. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(d).[2] Whether or not circumstances exist in any given case which warrant excluding certain periods of time pursuant to section (d) is to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WoodsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. AshfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980