Legal Opinion

Daniel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 1995No. 94-1827Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

2Per curiam

We grant the appellee’s motion for rehearing and the motion to supplement the record with an amended information that was inadvertently omitted from the record on appeal. See Kubernac v. Reid, 656 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (granting rehearing on the basis of a supplemental record); Stewart v. State, 508 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (same). The amended information conclusively demonstrates that the appellant was charged with possession of cannabis with the intent to distribute. Based upon the record as supplemented, we now affirm…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kubernac v. ReidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API