Legal Opinion

Downey v. Wilber

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1921No. 16475PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Askren, J., entered February 26, 1921, in favor of homestead claimants,, restraining a sale of property on execution, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On January 19, 1921, the appellant, Downey, recovered a judgment in a justice’s court of Pierce county against the respondents Wilber for the sum of sixty-four dollars and eighty-two cents. On the ninth day of the succeeding month, he caused a transcript thereof to be filed with the clerk of the superior court, and four days later caused an execution to issue thereon. The sheriff of the county, who held the writ in execution, levied upon property which he described as “One portable bungalow named Buena Vista,” and advertised the same for sale. The re*661spondents thereupon filed a homestead claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deere v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Conklin v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hogan v. MannersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Wike Bros. v. GarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Johnson v. RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Felton v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Desmond v. ShotwellWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Northwest Cascade, Inc. v. Unique Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BuschWashington Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API