Kim v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.
We issued an opinion in Howard Kim’s underlying conviction on October 6, 2004. The trial court’s judgment was affirmed.
Kim has now filed additional papers challenging his conviction asserting the trial court lacked jurisdiction and arguing, based on Ex 'parte Seidel 1 , that he can appeal a trial court’s lack of jurisdiction at any time. Kim is wrong. For at least three reasons, we do not have jurisdiction of his appeal, and we dismiss it.
Transfer Jurisdiction
Kim’s original criminal case was transferred to us, as the Supreme Court may do. See Tex. Gov’t Code…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte SeidelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles Ray Walton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Dalton Loyd Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- David Angel Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Ex Parte Alfred Lee Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Ex Parte Alfred Lee Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.