Legal Opinion

Mandeville v. Jarrett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1825PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Harford .county court. The affidavit oil which the attachment in this casa was issued under the act of 1795, ch. 5G, stated, that the plaintiff, (now appellant,) a citizen of this state, made oath, &c. that Camillus Griffith, not a citizen of this slate, and not residing therein, was bona file indebted to him, &c. The attachment being laid in the hands of Jarrell, (the appellee,) as garnishee, he appeared and pleaded non assumpsit by Griffith, and Nulla Ilona.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Harford .county court. The affidavit oil which the attachment in this casa was issued under the act of 1795, ch. 5G, stated, that the plaintiff, (now appellant,) a citizen of this state, made oath, &c. that Camillus Griffith, not a citizen of this slate, and not residing therein, was bona file indebted to him, &c. The attachment being laid in the hands of Jarrell, (the appellee,) as garnishee, he appeared and pleaded non assumpsit by Griffith, and Nulla Ilona. At the trial, the plaintiff read -in evidence the papers filed ill the cause, and proved that Camillus Griffith had…

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, Ch. J.

The' court affirm the judgment on the authority of Shivers vs. Wilson, there being1 no proof in the record that the plaintiff was a citizeri of this state,- of iff any of the United States: judgment Affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barr v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  2. Corrie's CaseHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1830

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API