Legal Opinion
In re Rupari Holding Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 18, 2017No. Case No. 17-10793 (KJC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION2
BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Before the Court is the Motion of Roma Dining, LLC and RomaCorp, Inc. (jointly, *114“Roma”) for an order (i) finding as a matter of law that a trademark license agreement cannot be assumed and assigned, even if it had not been terminated pre-petition, and (ii) in an abundance of caution, retroactively modifying the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d) if the automatic stay could be held to apply to the License Agreement (D.I. 224) (“Roma’s Motion”). Ruprecht Company filed a joinder to the Roma Motion (D.I. 233). The Debtors filed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In Re Albany Partners, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re Leonard J. Siciliano, Debtor. Prudential Savings Bank, PasaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Margaret J. Myers, Debtor. Margaret J. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Sharon Steel Corporation v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, Intervenor: James W. Toren, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- In the Matter of West Electronics Inc. Appeal of United States of America, by the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Siegal v. Everett (In re Siegal)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Brian Michael FerrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- In re: Mauro Sierra Nava, Sr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2025