Legal Opinion
Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1961No. 427PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The trial court sustained an exception of no cause of action filed to a third-party demand. This appeal is by the third-party plaintiffs (defendants in the original action) from the consequent dismissal of their third-party demand.
By the principal demand of this tort suit, the plaintiff prays for certain damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident of September 1, 1960. A companion suit decided this same day (Brown v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 136 So.2d 286) is brought by another plaintiff to recover for other damages resulting from the same accident. The accident was caused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Kahn v. Urania Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Linkenhoger v. Owens Linkenhoger v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Brown v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Henry v. JeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Julius Ducre v. The Executive Officers of Halter Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Vidrine v. SimoneauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brown v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Lanier v. TL James & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Martin v. Central Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.