Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Calkins

1. The defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions. There is no merit in this motion.

2. Since the court disallowed the attorney’s fees and the claim of penaltjq this assignment of error is moot.

3. The only'question to be determined is whether, in view of the provisions of the policy with reference thereunder, and the loan certificate, considered together, in the light of the facts of this case, the interest was payable in advance at the premium paying period, or was payable a year thereafter. It will be observed from the allegations of the petition and the evidence…