Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Oberly

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 8, 1988No. 85-5272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This interlocutory appeal, returned to us by the United States Supreme Court, raises a legal question under the Supremacy Clause: whether Delaware’s noise control statute and regulations thereunder are facially preempted by section 17 of the Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 4916(c) (1982). Because we conclude that the state regulatory scheme at issue in this appeal is not facially preempted by the federal statute, we will vacate the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining enforcement of Delaware’s noise control statute…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Oberly, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API