Legal Opinion
Baxley v. Wormuth
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 15, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2021-2245Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL C. BAXLEY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-2245 (TSC) CHRISTINE WORMUTH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Baxley, a former member of the United States Army, challenged the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records’ (“Board”) decision not to upgrade his “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” discharge to an Honorable discharge. The court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied Plaintiff’s cross motion, concluding that the Board engaged in reasoned decisionmaking under the Administrative…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.