Legal Opinion

Town of Brookline v. Medical Area Service Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 13, 1979PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

By statute,3 a substantial capital expenditure cannot be made for the construction of any part of a health care facility without a prior administrative determination by the Department of Public Health (department) that there is a need for the facility. The Medical Area Total Energy Plant, Inc., an urban renewal corporation formed pursuant to G. L. c. 121A, is in the process of constructing a total energy plant (plant or project) on land owned by Harvard in Boston. The plant is designed to provide electricity, steam, and chilled water to the members of the Medical Area Service Corporation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Investment Company Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. School Committee of Springfield v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Lawrence v. FalzaranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Mongeau v. BoutelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Town of Brookline v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Howe v. Health Facilities Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Mercy Hospital v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API