Legal Opinion

Grundt v. Shenk

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, George H., J.

The amended complaint alleges a contract in effect: (a) That the plaintiff promised to continue in the decedent’s employ and devote himself to the advancement of the latter’s interest and business affairs; and (b) that, in consideration thereof, the decedent promised to leave to the plaintiff, by will, $50,000. In fact: (1) The plaintiff thereafter continued in decedent’s employ in his real estate business to the date of the decedent’s death. The plaintiff received stipulated, and, from time to time, increased, pay for bis services. He also received certain bonuses. (2)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Robinson v. . RaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Willetts v. . the Sun Mutual Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Miller v. . McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Petze v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API