Legal Opinion

Serrano v. Gibson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 23, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CONLEY, J.A.D.

In Chatman v. Hall, 128 N.J. 394, 419-20, 608 A.2d 263 (1992), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the ninety-day notice requirement of the Tort Claims Act was not applicable to claims against public employees. See Williams v. Adams, 189 N.J.Super. 196, 198-99, 459 A.2d 707 (Law Div.1983); Lutz v. Semcer, 126 N.J.Super. 288, 300, 314 A.2d 86 (Law Div.1974). Effective June 23, 1994, N.J.S.A. 59:8-3 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 were amended to subject such claims to that notice requirement. L. 1994, c. 49, §§ 2, 4 (1994 amendments).1 As stated in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. In re D.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. Martin v. Unknown U.S. MarshalsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. Lombardo v. Revlon, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API