Serrano v. Gibson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
CONLEY, J.A.D.
In Chatman v. Hall, 128 N.J. 394, 419-20, 608 A.2d 263 (1992), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the ninety-day notice requirement of the Tort Claims Act was not applicable to claims against public employees. See Williams v. Adams, 189 N.J.Super. 196, 198-99, 459 A.2d 707 (Law Div.1983); Lutz v. Semcer, 126 N.J.Super. 288, 300, 314 A.2d 86 (Law Div.1974). Effective June 23, 1994, N.J.S.A. 59:8-3 and N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 were amended to subject such claims to that notice requirement. L. 1994, c. 49, §§ 2, 4 (1994 amendments).1 As stated in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- In re D.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Martin v. Unknown U.S. MarshalsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Lombardo v. Revlon, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.R.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.