Rancosky v. Washington National Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING
OPINION BY JENKINS, J.:
I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Conseco1 on Martin’s claims. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to vacate the judgment on LeAnn’s claims and remand for a new trial on LeAnn’s claim for bad faith under 42 Pa. C.S. § 8371. In my view, LeAnn’s bad faith claim is time-barred under Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations for bad faith, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524.
The majority contends in footnote 30 of its opinion that Conseco waived the statute of limitations issue by failing to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Adamski v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Richmond v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.