Legal Opinion

Linn v. Linn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Ingham; Person, J. Bill by Peter Linn, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Lawrence Linn, deceased, against Kate F. Linn and others, to revive certain mortgages. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This proceeding is in chancery. The bill of complaint states, in substance, as follows: The complainant is administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Lawrence Linn, deceased, who was a resident of Wyoming county, N. Y. The defendant Kate F. Linn is the widow, and the remaining defendants are the children and heirs at law, of John B. Linn, a late resident of the county of Ingham, and a son of said Lawrence Linn. _ John B. Linn died about February 9, 1892. Lawrence Linn died some time afterwards. Late in the winter of 1883, John B. Linn moved into the county of Ingham, and purchased…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fournier v. ChisholmMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Converse v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Shorebank Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API