Legal Opinion

Panitz v. Behrend

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided February 9, 1993No. 4900 of 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

WETTICK, J.,

Plaintiff’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to defendants’ counterclaim are the subject of this opinion and order of court.

Plaintiff, Elaine B. Panitz, is a medical doctor with a specialty in occupational and environmental medicine. Defendants Kenneth W. Behrend and Barbara Behrend Emsberger, individually and trading as Behrend and Emsberger (Behrend attorneys), are attorneys who represented John and Alice Chamey in a personal injury claim for injuries allegedly caused from exposure to formaldehyde.

*396Plaintiff was hired to testify as a medical expert in support of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Kemper v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Belfonte v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API